Chapter 5. The Great Replacement
Replacement Migration
The concept of The Great Replacement comes from France, and is first introduced and used by the author Camus in his book Le Grand Remplacement, where he argues that an european elite is in the process of replacing the native european population with people of immigrant origins.*
Intertwined with the falling birth rates in Europe and other developed countries is the issue of replacement migration. Instead of encouraging its own native population to have enough children, politicians and policymakers are advocating for immigration [19] to replace the deficit of young working-age people. The result of this policy is the gradual replacement of the native European population with peoples of foreign origin, not considering heritage and cultural conditions. However, stating the obvious and pointing this out is met with condemnations of “racism” by bad faith actors, making the public debate near impossible.
Since the first version of this book was published in 2002, a more sinister turn of events has taken place in the public discourse around demographics. When the replacement of Europeans is described by liberal and progressive voices it is portrayed as something positive; it is welcomed by the press and politicians. However, when those who point out the negative sides of this replacement and want it to be stopped or reversed, it is labelled as a “conspiracy theory” and denied by the very same press and politicians who previously lauded it.
In the following, you will see examples illustrating this.
Celebrated by the left
Media coverage of the changing demographics in the West is reported accurately when the reporter is positive about the change. Here are some examples:
Already on the 3. of Sep 2000, The Guardian wrote: “The last days of a white world” “We are near a global watershed – a time when white people will not be in the majority in the developed world, Britain included” and stating in the same article “[…] put a positive spin on the end of the white majority: ‘If there are no majorities, then there are no minorities.’ ”[20].
Since then, this position has been increasingly more common in Western political commentary.
On the 21. of August 2012, The Business Insider published an article from The Economist that made the case that “Sweden Will Have To Become A Lot Less Blond” [21]. In the article, they write that:
“Sentiment towards immigrants is less negative than in many European countries.
As in many other countries, immigration is a divisive political issue in Sweden. This was reinforced by the entry into parliament of the immigration-critical Sweden Democrats (SD) in 2010. Public opinion on immigration is divided but appears to have been improving over the past 20 years.”
The New Republic wrote in an article in 2014: “Five Charts That Show Why a Post-White America Is Already Here If you’re under 18, the future is now” [22].
US Census pointed out the same year (2014) in a headline that: “Projecting Majority-Minority – Non-Hispanic Whites May No Longer Comprise Over 50 Percent of the U.S. Population by 2044” [23].
National Public Radio reported in 2016 that: “Babies Of Color Are Now The Majority, Census Says”. “Today’s generation of schoolchildren looks much different than one just a few decades ago. Nonwhites are expected to become the majority of the nation’s children by 2020, as our colleague Bill Chappell reported last year. This is now the reality among the very youngest Americans: babies” [24].
The Independent explained in 2016 the electoral victory of Trump with the ethnic anxiety of white Americans’ fear of being replaced due to the rapid changes: “Donald Trump’s greatest weapon is white Americans’ fear that they’re quickly becoming a minority – because they are”. “In 1950 when Trump was four years old, the United States was 87.5 per cent non- Hispanic white, 10 per cent black and only 2.1 per cent Hispanic. By 2010, when Trump turned 64, the United States had become only 63.7 per cent non-Hispanic white, 16.3 per cent Hispanic and 12.3 per cent black. No other developed state has ever undergone ethnic change so rapid” [25].
Atlanta Black Star wrote the next year (2017): “The End of America’s White Majority Is Near: What are the Implications?” [26].
In this article, they report that:
“The Census Bureau reported that in 2011 a majority of babies under age one, born in the United States, were non-white. A majority of American children will be Black or Brown by 2020, which is already the case in the U.S. K-12 public school system. Some institutions of higher learning, such as Harvard University, have responded to the new reality by admitting its first majority nonwhite first-year class.”
In other words, the response to the demographic decline of white Americans is for an elite institution such as Harward to make a racially exclusively nonwhite first-year class. However, this is the opposite argument made. At the same time, there still was a white majority in the USA, when institutions were obliged to include quotas of etnic minorities into white majority classes. The argument is that because nonwhite minorities are minorities, we need to take extra care to include them. However, no such protection or special treatment seems to be afforded to the white part of the population now that they are becoming a minority. Now that nonwhite ethnic groups no longer have the prospect of remaining a minority, the argument changes to the exclusivity for those who are nonwhite, not including the future white minority.
Why is this the case? Where does this bias come from?
Further, we can read in the Brookings Institute celebrated this trend in 2018 in its article: “The US will become ‘minority white’ in 2045, Census projects – Youthful minorities are the engine of future growth” [24].
Washington Post had an article in 2018 that stated: “In a country where whites will lose majority status in about a quarter-century, and where research suggests that demographic anxiety is contributing to many of the social fissures polarising the United States, from immigration policy to welfare reform to the election of President Trump, the story of the coming decades will be, to some degree, the story of how white people adapt to a changing country” [27].
Brookings Institute reported in 2019 that: “Less than half of US children under 15 are white, the census shows” [28].
The Chicago Reporter (2019): “The US white majority will soon disappear forever” stating that “By 2050, the US will be a ‘majority- minority’ country, with white non-Hispanics making up less than half of the total population” [29].
The new US president Joe Biden, when he was vice-president during the Obama administration, said the following [30]:
“Not only our Muslim communities but African communities, Asian communities, Hispanic communities and the wave continues. It’s not going to stop. Nor should we want it to stop. It’s one of the things I think we can be most proud of. [..] So there’s a second thing in that bright box. An unrelenting stream of immigration. Non-stop. Folks like me, who are caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. From then on, fewer than 50% of the people in America will be white European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.”
As time passes, we can notice a change in the rhetoric from the established press and the Left, from the early 2000s and up until the 2020s. It goes from sober descriptive terms to a more and more positive framing and celebratory language. It is an excellent question, perhaps a forbidden question, to ask why this is.
Warnings from the right
A poll conducted by Harris Interactive in France on behalf of the new paper, Challenges [31], shows that 67 per cent of those participating in the poll were worried that there is a population replacement going on in their country, whereas those of French and European origin were displaced and replaced by immigration from Africa and the Middle East. According to this poll, the worry is greatest on the right, but substantial numbers on the left also reported Le Figaro [32] 21st of October in 2021.
The 2022 French election was a vote on replacement immigration. It brought a new and “radical” voice to the surface in the person of presidential candidate Éric Zemmour, who argued that France and the French people could not accept this replacement migration. He maintains that France’s French and European heritage has an innate value in and of itself and can only be cherished and maintained by an ethnically French population.
The Gatestone institute reported back in 2021 [33] that the coming French election would be about immigration and pointed to the increased crime, violence and polarisation in the country. Especially they were pointing out the growth of the Muslim population in France. They further quoted the open letter that French military servicemen signed and sent to their president Macron:
“Two thousand military servicemen signed a letter to French President Emmanuel Macron and the government, warning that France is on the verge of collapse and the civil war because the state has “surrendered” to radical Muslims. The letter followed an appeal by 20 retired generals and hundreds of former officers, in which they speak of “disintegration and Islamization” in progress, as well as a document sent to parliament by other generals and officers, proclaiming, “We are in a hybrid war, it is multifaceted and will end in a civil war at best and a cruel defeat with no future at worst”.
These are stark words coming from people whose calling in life was patriotic service to their country, placing their own lives on the line if need be.
However, such warnings and pointing out the same facts that many liberal institutions celebrate are brushed aside by authorities and the press; denounced as a “conspiracy theory”. Often referring to “The Great Replacement” as one of the most dangerous conspiracy theories. One example is from an article in The Guardian (2022) [34], the same news outlet that in 2000 reported on this demographic trend in a positive framing. The Guardian news article from 2022 reports that an […] 18-year-old alleged shooter is said to have endorsed the “great replacement theory”. And then goes on to mention Fox News host Tucker Carlson and Hungarian president Viktor Orbán in the next two paragraphs as guilt by association:
“The Fox News host Tucker Carlson had mentioned replacement theories more than 400 times on his show before the shooting. Afterwards, he initially sought to distance himself from it. “We’re still not sure exactly what it is,” he claimed on his show on 17 May. In the next breath, though, he doubled down. “Here’s what we do know, for a fact: there’s a strong political component to the Democratic party’s immigration theory … and they say out loud: ‘We are doing this because it helps us to win elections.’”
Two days after the shooting in Hungary, the newly re-elected prime minister, Viktor Orbán, was also doubling down. In a televised speech to mark the start of his fourth term, he claimed he was fighting against “the great European population exchange … a suicidal attempt to replace the lack of European, Christian children with adults from other civilisations – migrants”.”
The premise for what is called “The Great Replacement” conspiracy theory by liberal establishment institutions in the West is that this demographic trend is intentional and promoted by authorities and institutions across the western world. It is very curious, then, that as long as this demographic development is portrayed positively, it is welcomed to speak about it by these same institutions and newspapers, and it is not denied or denounced.
However, even if this demographic change is not promoted with an intention on the part of our liberal institutions and authorities here in the West, the responsibility still lies with our governing bodies, who have the power to act and can stop this demographic development. At the very least, they are guilty of gross negligence.
Who steers the political agenda?
Power always gravitates into the hands of the organised few who are capable of a modicum of collective action for the sake of their common class, religious or group interest. And in our globalised age there is an increasingly centralised financial and transnational elite that governs the movements of the world.
This transnational elite consists of about 2153 billionaires according to the Time magazine in January 2020 [35]. At the forefront of this global elite are the ultra rich and influential families, such as; the Rotschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Du Pont, Bush, Clintons, The Ford Foundation and Soros to mention the most known among them. As a result the high impact levers of control over the financial system that dominates our world, as well as ownership over the press and mass media, has ended up in the hands of very few people. This power rests on direct and indirect ownership, and the control of credit and capital flows. Nation states can be brought to their knees without access to the international capital markets, and most nations in the world have huge government debt; some of it larger than can ever be paid off. All of this is made possible through the practice of fractional reserve banking; propagated through an international central bank system. In addition to this, the biggest companies in the world are Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street Corporation, between them are the biggest shareholders in Apple, Facebook, Lockheed Martin, Tesla, MasterCard, Dupont, General Electric, Fox, Disney, Microsoft, Paramount and IBM [36]. A key to maintaining this control is to keep their power, ownership and methods of control opaque and out of the public limelight. As long as this stays out of the public mind there will be no meaningful opposition to it, and their power is safe.
This global elite wants to direct and manipulate elections worldwide by funding activist groups, NGOs and big media companies, including social media companies. Mass immigration of millions of people into the west also plays a big part in this. Massive migration across borders causes social fragmentation and as a result the bonds of national loyalty and common identity are broken down. When social trust and cohesion disintegrates, due to a lack of common customs, heritage and identity, societies become less resistant to outside manipulation. New immigrants do not usually share the same interests and degree of loyalty to the new nation that they now inhabit as compared to the native population. And being uprooted from their own previous nation many immigrants exist in a fluctuating rootless limbo, this creates a situation of vulnerability and dependency. This dependency can be turned into political power by actors who know how to play on this.
This allows for a new breed of globally oriented politicians that use these new immigrants as voting cattle, by offering them “protection” and free benefits in exchange for their votes. As a consequence these politicians rely less and less on votes from their own native populations, and thus are not obliged to win votes by promoting policies that have traditionally been regarded as common national interests. Furthermore, these globally oriented politicians are typically also the recipients of support and donations from the transnational financial class. This further divides and weakens western nations, making it more difficult for the native population of these nations to assert their national interests versus the international financial powers. This type of immigration is promoted by people such as billionaire and finance mogul George Soros through The Open Society Foundation, an NGO that he funds [37]. This is not unlike the divide and conquer strategy of former colonial powers, however in a much more subtle way. Thus the entire political system in the west is subverted away from serving the interest of its native population and skewed towards serving the interests of powerful transnational financial elites.
The primary object of this power structure is to keep its power. That is the iron rule of all power constellations that want to propagate itself and the benefits it confers on its beneficiaries. Only in this case the beneficiaries are not the peoples of a certain country.
This transnational financial elite and their companies influence and manipulate liberal and leftist people that do not understand that they are pawns governed by the richest and most cynical capitalists in the world. Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street Corporation own and control Big Pharma [38] and well known companies such as Pfizer, Moderna, Coca-Cola [39], Monsanto [40] and so on. Just to give an example, Pfizer had an advertisement budget of 21,11 Billion USD in the time periode 2009-2019 [41] and sometimes pays the lion’s share of the advertisement income of many papers, TV and radio stations. This kind of money gives power and influence.
But there is hope. The liberal press has slowly been losing its grip over the last two decades. CNN has lost 90% of the viewers [42]. Many papers have to close or radically cut down the employees. CNN+ had to close after 2 months while only having 10.000 subscribers despite a marketing budget of 400 million USD.
In the USA 59% of the people said they agree with the statement: That “most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public” [43]. People all over the world are waking up in droves to these facts, especially in the USA because this is where the battle of the future global order will be decided.
We see the BRICS countries are leaving the petrodollar and moving in towards a new gold and silver based system. On the 12th of March 2022 Russia linked its national currency, the ruble, to gold. The 19th of March Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Muhammed Bin Salman and China’s Xi Jin Ping agreed to decrease the influence of the petrodollar.
BRICS are also building their version of the SWIFT system, called SPFS. India’s ATMs might soon be ready to take Russian Mir debit and credit cards [44].
This means that Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street Corp will lose trillions of dollars and a significant amount of control in these countries.
Hopefully many immigrants will want to go back to their own countries when industry and production in their countries of origin will begin to grow. It is reasonable to anticipate that there will be economic growth in these countries, once the debt based money system, and global companies such as Vanguard and Blackrock, will not hinder local small and middle- sized companies from growing into national and regional alternatives.
Have faith. Be free in your thoughts. Do your own research. We will win this information war!
Order the book now at Amazon or Barnes & Noble.
Sources:
*Actually, Renaud Camus’s writing suggests more that ‘The Great Replacement’ is an observation.
19. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Population Division. Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? vol. no. 206., United Nations, New York, 2001:
“… the report considers replacement migration for eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to offset population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.” [https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf] (Accessed 11.07.22)
20. Browne, Anthony. 2000. The last days of a white world. Guardian News & Media Limited. [https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world] (Accessed 11.07.22)
21. The Economist. 2012. Sweden Will Have To Become A Lot Less Blond. [https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden-politics-immigration-and-population-ageing-present-policy-challeng-2012-8?r=US&IR=T] (Accessed 11.07.22)
22. Frey, William H. 2014. Five Charts That Show Why a Post-White America Is Already Here. The New Republic [https://newrepublic.com/article/120370/five- graphics-show-why-post-white-america-already-here] (Accessed 11.07.22)
23. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2014. Projecting Majority-Minority – Non- Hispanic Whites May No Longer Comprise Over 50 Percent of the U.S. Population by 2044 [https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/newsroom/ releases/2015/cb15-tps16_graphic.pdf] (Accessed 11.07.22)
24. Yoshinaga, Kendra. 2016. Babies Of Color Are Now The Majority, Census Says. npr. [https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/07/01/484325664/babies-of-color-are- now-the-majority-census-says?t=1657549204009] (Accessed 11.07.22)
25. Judah, Ben. 2016. Donald Trump’s greatest weapon is white Americans’ fear that they’re quickly becoming… The Independent. [https://www.independent.co.uk/ voices/donald-trump-us-elections-hillary-clinton-race-hispanic-black-vote-white- americans-fear-minority-true-a7402296.html] (Accessed 11.07.22)
26. Love, David. 2017. The End of America’s White Majority Is Near: What are the Implications? Atlanta Black Star. [https://atlantablackstar.com/2017/09/12/end- americas-white-majority-near-implications/] (Accessed 11.07.22)
27. McCoy, Terrence. 2018. White, and in the minority. The Washington Post. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/07/30/feature/majority-minority-white-workers-at-this-pennsylvania-chicken-plant-now-struggle-to-fit-in/] (Accessed 11.07.22)
28. Frey, William H. 2019. Less than half of US children under 15 are white, census shows. The Brookings Institution. [https://www.brookings.edu/research/less-than- half-of-us-children-under-15-are-white-census-shows/] (Accessed 11.07.22)
29. Poston, Dudley and Sáenz, Rogelio. 2019. The US white majority will soon disappear forever. The Chicago Reporter. [https://www.chicagoreporter.com/the-us- white-majority-will-soon-disappear-forever/] (Accessed 11.07.22)
30. Gateway Pundit. 2018 Joe Biden: “Whites will be an ABSOLUTE minority in America – that’s a source of our strength.” Youtube. [https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=UgrliuQW_-Q] (Accessed 11.07.22)
31. de Menthon, Pierre-Henri. 2021. 67% des Français s’inquiètent d’un “grand remplacement” Challenges. [https://www.challenges.fr/france/67-des-francais-s- inquietent-d-un-grand-remplacement_785793] (Accessed 11.07.22)
32. Le Figaro. 2021. 67% de Français inquiets par l’idée d’un “grand remplacement”, selon un sondage. [https://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/67-de-francais-inquiets-par-l-idee-d-un- grand-remplacement-selon-un-sondage-20211021] (Accessed 11.07.22)
33. Meotti, Giulio. 2021. France to Vote on the Great Replacement of Western Civilization. The Gatestone institute. [https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17843/ france-election-immigration] (Accessed 11.07.22)
34. Rose, Steve. 2022. A deadly ideology: how the ‘great replacement theory’ went mainstream. [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/08/a-deadly-ideology- how-the-great-replacement-theory-went-mainstream] (Accessed 11.08.22)
35. 2020. Bates, Josiah. Billionaires Have More Wealth Than 60% of the World’s Population, Report Finds. TIME USA, LLC. [https://time.com/ 5768346/billionaires-wealth/] (Accessed 11.08.22)
36. Reuters Fact Check. 2022. [https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-business- investment-idUSL2N2WI1K4] Reuters (Accessed 11.08.22)
37. 2017. Monroe, Nick. The Soros Saga. [https://medium.com/@nickmon1112/ the-soros-saga-a487518e2869] (Accessed 11.08.22)
38. 2021. Dr. Mercola, Joseph. Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess. Children’s Health Defense. [https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ blackrock-vanguard-own-big-pharma-media/] (Accessed 11.08.22)
39. 2022. YU., JEA. Top 4 Mutual Fund Holders of Coca-Cola. [https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/032116/top-4-mutual-fund- holders-cocacola-ko-vtsmx.asp] (Accessed 11.08.22)
40. 2021. Sarich, Christina. Who are Really the Top Shareholders of Monsanto? Natural Society. [https://naturalsociety.com/who-are-really-the-top-shareholders-of- monsanto/] (Accessed 11.08.22)
41. Pfizer’s advertising spending in the United States from 2009 to 2019. Statista GmbH.
[https://www.statista.com/statistics/192112/us-ad-spending-of-pfizer/] (Accessed 11.08.22)
42. 2022. Anderson, Natasha. Tuning out! Viewership at scandal-plagued CNN plummets by as much as 90% from last year in both overall audience and in advertiser-coveted 25-to-54 demographic. Associated Newspapers Ltd. [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10394997/CNN-loses-nearly-90- advertiser-coveted-demographics-overall-total-audience.html] (Accessed 11.08.22)
43. 2021. Meek, Andy. Fewer Americans Than Ever Before Trust The Mainstream Media. Forbes Media LLC [https://www.forbes.com/sites/andymeek/2021/02/20/fewer-americans-than-ever- before-trust-the-mainstream-media/?sh=16cee3cd282a] (Accessed 11.08.22)
44. Srivastava, Shruti and Beniwal, Vrishti. 2022. Russia offers SWIFT alternative to India for rouble payments. The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd. [https://www.deccanherald.com/business/business-news/russia-offers-swift- alternative-to-india-for-rouble-payments-1096109.html] (Accessed 4.10.22)
Top photo: 160729-N-EU999-007 MEDITERRANEAN SEA (July 29, 2016) A Visit, Board, Search and Seizure team from the guided-missile destroyer USS Carney (DDG 64) approaches a migrant vessel in the Mediterranean Ocean. Carney provided food and water to the migrants aboard the vessel before coordinating with a nearby merchant vessel to take them to safety. Carney is forward deployed to Rota, Spain, and is conducting a routine patrol in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe. (U.S. navy photo by Chief Information Systems Technician Wesley R. Dickey/Released). Public domain.
